Pages

0 comments Love ep2: Happiness Effect

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Before I start, I'd just like to say that I'm not sorry for the lack of LSTE last Monday after I said I'd deliver it on that day. I reserve all rights to feed you guys with complete bullshit. There was absolutely no way I could've finished last week's addition on a week day. As such(!), I will do the best I can to continue delivering it every Sunday.

Three weeks ago, we defined what love was and also whipped together an illustration of it in the form of an axis. Wasn't that nifty?! But we only briefly went over causes and effects. Initially, I was going to go over all that here, but for now, I opted to stick to what we'll call the "Happiness Effect". Creative naming, isn't it?

We're all happy when we spend time with our loved ones, and whenever we can, we seek out opportunities to pursue that happiness with them. We go out and get lattes, play a game, or plan out events and projects together. Happiness, in its own right, is an addictive high that we actively pursue, and an even greater one when we can accomplish it with another person. But like any other high, is there a danger presented here merely by wanting to be happy with our loved ones? Possibly.

Let's do an experiment. Place a small, helpless child in an empty room. Observe how he perceives his current situation as dull and unexciting. Give a toy for him to play with and continue watching. See how content he is? Now be the cruel monster that you are and pry it away from his hands and smash it to pieces in front of him. Now see how he's in tears? Isn't that fascinating?

What's important to note in the observations of our experiment was the change in behavior in relation to the introduction and removal of the toy. From happy to sad, yes? Wrong. That's not important. I told you to observe his behavior before introducing the toy to the child but you obviously weren't paying attention. The child was bored and relatively neutral in emotion before the toy. The whole point of the experiment was to notice how when you smashed his happiness to pieces along with the toy (you sadistic monster), he became sad instead of returning to his neutral emotional state. This is true for any situation when love in someone's life has come under siege. But why is this so? It's because sadness and happiness are like two ends of a simple gravitational pendulum.

Real quickly, a simple gravitational pendulum is a weight on the end of a massless cord suspended from a pivot, without friction. When given an initial push, it will swing back and forth at a constant amplitude. It's this constant amplitude that takes effect between happiness and sadness. Take a look at this pendulum:


In it, we have two sides, happiness (yellow shade) and sadness (blue shade). The initial push on the weight is the introduction of love. When that happens, it swings into the yellow shade. The amount of happiness that comes from love determines just how hard the push was, and thus, how far the weight swings into the yellow shade. At the point where love is threatened, the weight will then swing into the blue shade with the exact same amplitude. When we lose someone not so incredibly dear to us, we are not so incredibly devastated by the loss. It's a good rule of thumb for realizing just how much or how little you loved someone after a soured relationship.

Keep in mind that this effect is not exclusive to losing your loved one. It also occurs when someone we love hurts us in some way. The greater we love someone, the greater damage they can potentially inflict. This is due to the amount of trust, secrets, and the pieces of our mind we impart from ourselves, turned around and used as a weapon against us. Basically, the love we give can be used against us.

All in all, the point of this topic is just  to act as a reminder that when you're feeling torn, you are only subconsciously thinking of all the wonderful moments you had that gave you a smile and it's time to pursue them again.

0 comments Unexpected Delay

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Due to medical reasons (recovering from grenade blasts), K. Rabbit won't be able to provide this week's addition to LSTE until tomorrow.

1 comments Privacy

Sunday, October 10, 2010

One of the things I love about growing up in the US is growing up with the concept of privacy.  Did you know that such a thing is only associated in western culture? Many languages like Russian (along with all other Slavic languages) don't even have a word for "privacy" and so rely on creating complex terms from existing words or borrowing the very word from the English language. Not only that but Anglo-American culture sets it apart from even Western European countries. It's a fundamental view derived from old isolationist movements to secede from the British Empire and live separately from the rest of the world.

Privacy is important for the well being of a human's mind. It's security for thoughts that would otherwise conflict with society's views. But why is providing protection for such a thing so important? It's because it's this conflict that defines the existence of individual thought from the unanimous thought of society. Without individual thought, there are no internal conflicts, no impurities in humanity, and we are left as a single collective with human beings as its cellular structure. Some may call this paradise because of its harmonic, utopian value where we progress in the universe with great efficiency. I call it stagnation where culture becomes synonymous with human survival, and creativity & art cease to exist.

To destroy a person's privacy is to destroy his mind.

0 comments Love

Saturday, October 2, 2010

We all say "I love you" to one another at some point, often on a daily basis, but what do we mean when we say this? Is it an action? A feeling? Is there a set standard to abide by, and if so, how is it defined? These are among the most frequently asked questions involving love, but sadly, none of them are easy to answer. The problem doesn't stem from the fact that people are uninterested in the subject. On the contrary, there are countless sources available to the public that provide definitions. So then what is the problem? These definitions contradict each other.

In Greek mythology, Pygmalion was a sculptor who crafted a statue of a woman that was so realistic and perfect that he fell in love with it. This representation of love is something of a physical desire. From the bible, love has a more divine meaning, where God is love, and seems to be represented by the intent of gifting to others, such as God's promise of immortality. These are classic depictions of love, but today, there are numerous definitions found around the world and with media outlets like the internet, this can seem very daunting. So rather than try and point out which theory is correct, I will instead confuse you further by adding my own opinion onto the mess about what love is.

Religious love, friendship, familial love, romantic love, they're all the same thing. Love is an axis measured by the level of attraction to another person. This ranges from negative values (hate) to positive values (like). Plain and simple, as depicted by this nifty illustration here:


However, what isn't simple is determining what factors contribute to changes in level on this axis because they're defined differently for each individual. For example, some may separate sex from love, some may include it, and others base love entirely upon it. It's all personal preference. Of course, sex is ambiguously used here to refer to a broader range of things, from physical attraction to that favorite sex position of yours. Factors are different depending on the situation of the loved one as well. If you felt love towards your family, it wouldn't be because they were physically attractive... usually.

Another thing to note here is that in addition to there being varying factors responsible for changing the level of love, there are also varying effects taken due to this level. This is basically how you would express your love. Again, this is all personal preference and largely dependent on the situation of the loved one. Obviously, you wouldn't want to fuck your family but you may rank "Let's fuck" alongside "I'd do anything for you", or you may swap the polar opposites of the axis itself if you so desired (you sick fuck)

Causes and effects of love are a subject for another time,